For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a friend - my own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of easy triggers about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, pipewiki.org but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, given that rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, wiki.monnaie-libre.fr based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "customised gag gift", bphomesteading.com and the books do not get sold even more.

He hopes to widen his range, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, e.bike.free.fr artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for imaginative purposes need to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really effective however let's develop it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers' content on the web to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of happiness," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its finest performing industries on the unclear promise of development."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them certify their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national information library containing public data from a vast array of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.